AVERAGE HAPPINESS IN 148 NATIONS 2000-2009
How much people enjoy their life-as-a-whole on scale 0 to 10

Top/bottom

Full list

Technical details

Cite as

Top/bottom

Top

>7.9

Middle range

± 6.0

Bottom

<4.3
 

Costa Rica
8.5

France

6.6

Benin

3.0
Denmark
8.3

China

6.4

Burundi

2.9
Iceland
8.2

Iran

5.8

Zimbabwe

2.8
Switzerland
8.0

India

5.5

Togo

2.6
Canada
8.0

Phillippines

5.5

Tanzania

2.6

Full list. alphabetic

nation1

Satisfaction with life 2. 3
(scale 0 - 10)

Number of surveys

Rank

Afghanistan
4.1
1
134-135
Albania
4.6
1
121-122
Algeria
5.4
2
92-95
Andorra
6.8
1
37-39
Angola
4.3
1
129-132

Argentina

7.3
2
21-23

Armenia

5.0
1
106-110

Australia

7.7
8
11-14

Austria

7.7
7
11-14

Azerbaijan

5.3
1
96-100

Bangladesh

5.3
2
96-100
Belarus
5.7
2
78-84

Belgium

7.3
5
21-23
Belize
6.6
1
44-49
Benin
3.0
1
144

Bolivia

6.5
1
50-53
Bosnia
5.8
1
74-77
Botswana
4.7
1
114-120

Brazil

7.5
2
18-19

Bulgaria

4.4
2
127-128
Burkina Faso
4.4
2
127-128
Burundi
2.9
1
145
Cambodia
4.9
1
111-113
Cameroon
3.9
1
136-137

Canada 

8.0
1
4-5
Central African Republic4
4.6
1
121-122
Chad
5.4
1
92-95

Chile

6.6
2
44-49

China

6.4
2
54-55

Colombia

7.7
2
11-14
Congo-Brazzaville
3.7
1
140-141
Congo (Kinshasa)4
4.4
1
134-135
Costa Rica
8.5
1
1
Croatia
6.0
1
67-70
Cyprus
7.0
3
31-33

Czech Republic

6.5
4
50-53

Denmark

8.3
5
2
Djibouti
5.7
1
78-84

Dominican Republic

7.6
2
15-17
Ecuador
6.4
1
54-55
Egypt
5.7
4
78-84
El Salvador
6.7
1
40-43
Estonia
5.9
3
71-73
Ethiopia
4.2
2
133

Finland

7.9
5
6-8

France

6.6
5
44-49

Georgia

4.3
1
129-132

Germany

7.1
9
28-30
Ghana
5.2
2
101-103

Greece

6.3
3
56-58

Guatemala4

7.2
3
24-27
Guinea4
4.5
1
123-126
Guyana
6.5
1
50-53
Haiti4
3.9
2
136-137
Honduras
7.0
1
31-33
Hong Kong
6.0
1
67-70
Hungary
5.5
4
87-91
Iceland
8.2
2
3
India
5.5
1
87-91
Indonesia
6.1
3
63-66
Iran
5.8
2
74-77
Iraq
4.7
3
114-120

Ireland

7.6
3
15-17
Israel
6.9
3
34-36
Italy
6.7
4
40-43
Ivory Coast
4.5
1
123-126
Jamaica4
6.7
1
40-43
Japan
6.2
3
59-62
Jordan
6.2
4
59-62
Kazakhstan
6.1
1
63-66
Kenya
3.4
1
143
Kosovo4
5.4
2
92-95
Kuwait4
6.6
2
44-49
Kyrgezigstan
5.5
2
87-91
Laos
6.2
1
59-62
Latvia
5.3
1
96-100
Lebanon
4.7
1
114-120
Liberia4
4.3
1
129-132
Lithuania
5.5
1
87-91

Luxembourg

7.7
3
11-14
Macedonia
4.7
1
114-120
Madagascar
3.7
1
140-141
Malawi4
4.8
2
114-120
Malaysia
6.6
2
44-49
Mali
4.7
2
114-120
Malta
7.1
1
28-30
Mauritania
5.0
1
106-110
Mexico
7.9
2
6-8
Moldova
4.9
3
111-113
Mongolia
5.7
1
78-84
Montenegro
5.2
1
101-103
Morocco
5.3
3
96-100
Mozambique
3.8
1
138-139
Namibia4
5.2
1
101-103
Nepal
5.3
1
96-100

Netherlands

7.6
5
15-17
New Zealand
7.5
2
18-19
Nicaragua
7.1
1
28-30
Niger
3.8
1
138-139
Nigeria
5.7
2
78-84
Norway
7.9
4
6-8
Pakistan
5.4
3
92-95
Palestina
5.0
1
106-110
Panama
7.8
1
9-10
Paraguay
6.9
1
34-36
Peru
6.3
3
56-58
Philippines
5.5
2
87-91

Poland

6.3
5
56-58

Portugal

5.7
4
78-84
Qatar
6.8
1
37-39

Romania

5.7
4
78-84
Russia
5.6
3
85-86
Rwanda
4.3
2
129-132
Saudi Arabia
6.5
3
50-53
Senegal
4.5
1
123-126
Serbia
5.6
2
85-86
Sierra Leone
3.6
1
142
Singapore
6.7
3
40-43
Slovakia
5.8
2
74-77
Slovenia
6.9
5
34-36
South Africa
6.0
4
67-70
South Korea
6.1
2
63-66
Spain
7.3
9
21-23
Sri Lanka
5.1
2
104-106
Sudan4
5.0
1
111-113
Sweden
7.8
9
9-10
Switzerland
8.0
4
4-5
Syria
5.9
1
71-73
Taiwan
6.2
1
59-62
Tajikistan
5.1
1
104-106
Tanzania
2.6
2
147-148
Thailand
6.6
2
44-49
Togo
2.6
1
147-148
Trinidad-Tabago
7.0
1
31-33
Tunisia
5.9
1
71-73
Turkey
5.8
4
74-77
Uganda
4.5
2
123-126
Ukraine
5.0
3
106-110
United Arab Emirates4
7.3
1
24-27
United Kingdom (Britain)
7.2
6
24-27
United States of America (USA)
7.4
2
20
Uruguay
6.8
1
37-39
Uzbekistan
6.0
1
67-70
Venezuela
7.2
1
24-27
Vietnam
6.1
3
63-66
Yemen4
4.8
2
114-120
Zambia
5.0
2
106-110
Zimbabwe
2.8
2
146

Technical details

  1. Life-satisfaction is assessed by means of surveys in general population samples. Mean scores may be inflated in some countries. due to under sampling of rural and illiterate population. This distortion is partly corrected by weighting afterwards. but may still affect the scores. This means that the real differences in  life-satisfaction are probably somewhat greater than appears in these data.

  2. Data from 2000 up to and including 2009. If the below mentioned questions had been used more than once in this era. the average score is used.

  3. The scores are based on responses to a question about satisfaction with life. the answers to which were rated on a numerical scale ranging from 'dissatisfied' to 'satisfied'.  The questions differ slightly in wording and answer format. Most questions are type O-SLW/c/sq/n/10/a (used in the World value Surveys) and O-SLW/c/sq/n/11/a (used in the Gallup World Poll). This classification is explained in section 4/3 of the introductory text. Data were taken from the tables 122D and 122E from this collection of distributional findings on Happiness in Nations. Rating scales ranged from 1 to 10 or from 0 to 10. Scores on this 1-10 scale were transformed linearly to range 0-10. This transformation in explained in the introductory text. chapter 7.3.

  4. Scores of 13 nations are based on responses to a somewhat different question: "Suppose the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder the worst possible life. Where on this ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time?". The response was rated on a ladder scale ranging from 0 to 10 (question code C-BW/c/sq/l/11/a and c).Data were taken from the tables 31C en 31D from this database. We transformed the scores using the information of  nations in which both this item and the above question on life-satisfaction had been used in about the same years. There are 103 such cases. The scores on the two items appears to be highly correlated: r = +.82 and examination of the scatterplot shows a linear pattern. We computed the regression equation and used these to estimate the score on 0-10 life-satisfaction. The formula is: Estimated 0-10 life satisfaction = 1.156 x observed score on the Best-Worst item - 0.457 . These estimates are reported in this table. The 95% confidence interval around these estimated values is about 1.3 points. which means that these estimates are not very precise.

    This estimation technique is described in more detail in the Introductory Text. chapter 7 'Comparability of the data' in section 7/3.1 'Converting scores on measures of different happiness variants'.

  5. On this list the following cases are left out: Puerto Rico (8.3). East Germany (6.4) and West Germany (7.0). These cases are included in the collection of Happiness in Nations but are no real 'nations'.

  6. Cuba and Myanmar were involved in the 2006 Gallup WorldPoll. but are not included in this list since the sample was restricted to urban people.

  7.  The use for these data for estimating livability of nations is discussed in the Introductory Text to this section on 'Distributional Findings in Nations'. chapter 5: Validity of happiness as an indicator of livability'

  8.  This list is included in the datafile 'States of nations' as variable HappinessLSBW10.11_2000.09.

Cite as:
Veenhoven. R.. Average happiness in 148 nations 2000-2009 . World Database of Happiness. RankReport 2009-1d. Internet: worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl